@article{oai:kinwu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000106,
 author = {平田, 常子 and ヒラタ, ツネコ and Hirata, Tsuneko},
 journal = {近畿福祉大学紀要},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {P(論文), The right to self-determination was the subject for discussion in the case of Jehovah's Witness. The right to self-determination presupposes those who satisfy the criteria of rational thought and independence(autonomy). The others who fail to satisfy the precondition are treated as "different". There is a possibility that this distinction makes a fixed discrimination between the normal group and the abnormal, autonomous individuals and those in relationships of dependency. But according to Feminist Martha Minow(Professor at Harverd University), there is not a fixed discrimination. She argued that the whole concept of a boundary depends on relationships, although law's usual boundaries distinguish the self from others. Boundaries, whether social, psychological, or legal, do not exist naturally. The autonomous rights-bearing individual presupposes a community - a community willing to recognize and enforce individual rights. Minow considers rights as tools of communal dialogue.},
 pages = {44--54},
 title = {自己決定「権」と関係性 : -「エホバの証人」輸血拒否事件を手がかりに-},
 volume = {2},
 year = {2001}
}